k-flash post

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Konrad Häuptli graduated from the University of Berne, qualified as an attorney-at-law and was admitted to the Bar of the Canton of Berne. He joined HSBC in 2002 after working with Swiss Re for over 20 years. He then went on to work for KENDRIS in 2016 after retiring as former CEO of HSBC’s Trust Companies in Switzerland. Konrad Häuptli is a member of the Advisory Board of the Swiss Association of Trust Companies (SATC) and is also a member of mixed expert groups representing SATC. He has been managing family assets and has been involved in entrepreneurial activities, board assignments as well as private equity investments.
Change in Circumstances (CiC):

The case

Change in Circumstances (CiC): With regard to CiC regarding “individuals” the question is whether the Swiss AEoI Guidelines (Guidelines) request “more” (additional quality of) information and documentation (documentary evidence?) than the CRS?

With regard to differentiate between the mentioned Swiss regulation and the OECD Standard (CRS) I am referring to note 12 on p. 130 CRS Commentary: … must obtain either i) a valid SC (…), or ii) a reasonable explanation and documentation (…).

The “Procedure for determining a change in circumstances for individuals” is determined in point 6.6.1.2 of the Guidelines:

If the Reporting Swiss FI discovers one or more indicia in accordance with Point 6.2.1.2.3.1 such that it must proceed as indicated above due to a change in circumstances, the Reporting Swiss FI must either obtain a valid self-certification indicating (CRS states: “establish”) the tax residence of the Account Holder or an appropriate (CRS states: reasonable) explanation and documentation (CRS states: as appropriate) – whereas the Guidelines requires “documentary evidence” – which confirms (CRS states: supporting) the validity of the original self-certification within 90 days of discovering the change in circumstances in the case of New Accounts, or no later than the last day of the current calendar year or within 90 days of discovering the change in circumstances in the case of Pre-existing Accounts (similar to the Remedy Procedures in accordance with Point 6.2.1.2.4). The plausibility test of the self-certification is always performed based on the current situation at the time of submission.

Documentary evidence” as defined in point 5.9 of the Guidelines refers to certificate issued by an authorised government body.

Source: CRS and Swiss AEoI Guidelines

The commentary

With regard to “documentation” (as appropriate) the CRS seems to be more flexible compared to the Guidelines (requiring “documentary evidence). As part of a peer review, the Global Forum examines the requirements of the CRS. However, a Swiss FI must implement the Guidelines.

This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

RECENT POSTS

Federal Administrative Court Reaffirms Limits on FINMA’s Enforcement Powers

The Case: Federal Administrative Court reaffirms limits on enforcement powers. The Commentary: In a recent decision, the Swiss Federal Administrative Court upheld a bank’s appeal (represented by Homburger) against a FINMA enforcement decision concerning alleged anti-money laundering deficiencies. The Court set aside FINMA’s disgorgement order and remedial measures, ruling that…

The AI Elite vs. Magnifica Humanitas

The Case: This thought-provoking book brings together the people shaping the future of artificial intelligence. The pioneering scientists who laid its foundations, the researchers and engineers driving today’s breakthroughs, the leaders behind OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta, Anthropic, SpaceXAI, Amazon and Oracle, the investors pouring billions into the AI…

Search

TRANSLATE

Newsletter

Related Posts

Sanctions

The Case: Managing indirect exposure risks in a landscape that keeps shifting global sanctions. The Commentary: Geopolitical tensions have been contributing towards a more aggressive and interconnected global sanctions environment, with regulators increasingly scrutinizing indirect exposure arising from complex cross-border commercial networks. As sanctions regimes evolve, companies face increased legal,…

FINMA – Insurance Intermediaries

The Case: Supervision is strengthening client protection, but further action is needed in order to prevent abuse. The Commentary: The revised Insurance Supervision Act (ISA) and Insurance Supervision Ordinance (ISO) entered into force on 1 January 2024, introducing significant reforms to the insurance intermediary market. Two and a half years…

Outlook 2026: Higher Inflation and Weaker Investment

The Case: What will we remember about 2024? The Commentary: Through a selection of photos from the Swiss media, the exhibition “Swiss Press Photo 25” reveals the prizewinning images from the competition of the same name that celebrates the best of Swiss photojournalism every year.

Categories