The case
In recent decades, international tax law has applied the “arm’s length” principle: in a country where a local subsidiary of a group was active, the appropriate profit was attributed to this subsidiary for its activity. After a careful comparison of the tax authorities of the respective country with independent, other similar subsidiaries in the country of resident, the “appropriateness” was determined in the specific case and verified on the basis of statistics. In future, in addition to the already reported “arm’s length” profit from the local activity of the subsidiary, large groups should allocate a part of the consolidated group profit to the countries where the subsidiary is located. The consolidated net profit includes, among other things, the value of the patents, the research and development work paid, the proceeds from the worldwide sales of products, the manufacturing costs for the products, the costs of product information, marketing and the group central administration costs after deduction of the financial income. In future, this group profit is to be taxed at 15%.
Source: today’s NZZ Reader’s Opinion (heavily modified)
The commentary
The “arm’s length” principle has sensibly and correctly determined the local profit allocation of subsidiaries for decades. With the global minimum tax, this proven principle could be partially overruled in the future. Is this factually correct and justified in terms of tax methodology? From the perspective of a highly industrialised small state, hardly!
This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.