k-flash post

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Konrad Häuptli graduated from the University of Berne, qualified as an attorney-at-law and was admitted to the Bar of the Canton of Berne. He joined HSBC in 2002 after working with Swiss Re for over 20 years. He then went on to work for KENDRIS in 2016 after retiring as former CEO of HSBC’s Trust Companies in Switzerland. Konrad Häuptli is a member of the Advisory Board of the Swiss Association of Trust Companies (SATC) and is also a member of mixed expert groups representing SATC. He has been managing family assets and has been involved in entrepreneurial activities, board assignments as well as private equity investments.
Recent Decisions of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court

The case

Direct federal tax and state and municipal taxes (Bern), withholding tax 2009 and 2010; B, resident in Spain, provided services to AAG, resident in Switzerland, which AAG booked under “franchise fees” as operating expenses. The cantonal tax administration of Bern qualified these “franchise fees” as income from employment and B subjected to withholding tax in this respect. The complainant, AAG, is not able to convincingly demonstrate that B did not provide the services in Switzerland and therefore no withholding tax was due. Furthermore, the complainant’s objection that B returned the benefits to AAG after the tax consequences became known does not change the tax liability of the latter, as a mere mistake of motive when concluding the contract is irrelevant under tax law. Dismissal of the taxpayer’s appeal. For more see link (German).

Source: taxlawblog (partially supplemented and amended)

The commentary

During the summer season, something to smile about: Waste taxes of Lohn-Ammannsegg 2019 (Solothurn): Correction of the lower court and approval of the taxpayer’s appeal. According to the municipal law of Lohn-Ammannsegg, the tax for waste is levied per household. The complainant (born 1928) still lived in her own flat in 2019, but no longer had her own household (son takes care of her). The Administrative Court of the Canton of Solothurn did not make any different findings of fact and based its reasoning essentially on the existence of two flats. Thus, it applied communal law arbitrarily. For more see link (German).

 

This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.

Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

RECENT POSTS

Fischer Convicted, Xhaka Under Investigation

The Case: In 2023 Patrick Fischer, former head coach of the Swiss national ice hockey team, was convicted of document forgery in connection with a falsified Covid vaccination certificate and was given a monetary penalty of CHF 38,910. Now another case involving a famous sportsman has evolved. The Commentary: The…

Something beyond happiness

The Case: Moments that many regard as the height of happiness are, for some philosophers, merely fleeting episodes of pleasure. Once they fade, the restless mind begins reaching again for new goals, experiences and distractions. The Commentary: For Schopenhauer, many of the experiences commonly associated with happiness – travelling, golden…

Search

TRANSLATE

Newsletter

Related Posts

Tax Treatment of Shares Transferred as Part of a Corporate Succession Plan

The Case: The Federal Supreme Court had to determine whether the 795 shares bequeathed to a long-standing managing director and member of the board of directors under an inheritance agreement constituted taxable income or a bequest. A further issue was whether the authorities concerned had standing to bring an appeal…

Input VAT Deduction and Timing of Invoice Issuance

The Case: A taxpayer claimed an input VAT deduction for consulting services. The Federal Administrative Court rejected the claim, among other reasons, because the services had been obtained prior to the commencement of the taxpayer’s VAT liability. The Commentary: The Swiss Federal Supreme Court overturned this approach, making clear that…

Does a Treasure Find constitute Taxable Income?

The Case: The Federal Direct Tax Act (DBG) does not expressly define the concept of “income.” The Commentary: Instead, Art. 16 para. 1 DBG contains a broad general clause based on an economically connecting factor. While this approach somewhat reduces legal certainty, it enables the taxation of economic benefits that…

Categories