The case

The FATF requested comments on its updated risk-based guidance on Recommendation 25 on beneficial ownership and transparency of legal arrangements. Comments on the “Draft Amendments to the FATF Guidelines on Beneficial Ownership (R.25)” were due by 8 December (18:00 CET).

Source: FATF and extract of one of the comments forwarded

The commentary

What is of particular interest at this point in time are the answers to question 5 concerning the proposed approaches to identifying, assessing and mitigating the ML/TF risks associated with different types of legal arrangements (trusts under domestic law, foreign trusts administered in the country as well as foreign trusts with sufficient connections to the country).

According to a statement made by an international organization, one will have to clarifiy what counts as a sufficient connection to a country. It is suggested that the starting point should be the registered office of the trustee but not the applicable law of the country under which the trust was established. For example, trustees of Cayman Islands law trusts who are residents of Hong Kong and Singapore are not necessarily subject to the full extent of Cayman Islands law as would apply to trustees. There is no trust law in Switzerland, so Swiss trustees act as trustees of trusts that are subject to a variety of laws (e.g. BVl, Jersey and Cayman).

This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.