k-flash post

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Konrad Häuptli graduated from the University of Berne, qualified as an attorney-at-law and was admitted to the Bar of the Canton of Berne. He joined HSBC in 2002 after working with Swiss Re for over 20 years. He then went on to work for KENDRIS in 2016 after retiring as former CEO of HSBC’s Trust Companies in Switzerland. Konrad Häuptli is a member of the Advisory Board of the Swiss Association of Trust Companies (SATC) and is also a member of mixed expert groups representing SATC. He has been managing family assets and has been involved in entrepreneurial activities, board assignments as well as private equity investments.
Deleting article 35 from TJPG

The case

On 18 December 2024 the members of the Upper Chamber deal with agenda item no. 24.046 Federal Act on the Transparency of Legal Persons and the Identification of Beneficiaries (TJPG). The whole of Switzerland’s financial marketplace will be affected by the consequences of this act.

Source: ABPS Newsletter No 35 / 29.11.2024 – & TJPG (in German)

The commentary

The draft bill plans for the creation of a centralized register, which has not been disputed. What has been causing some ripples is the fact that in its current version the draft entails a number of problems when implementing the law, which is why the fiduciary industry has proposed that article 35 from TJPG be deleted, for unless this is done, financial intermediaries have access to the register.

The access to this register must be the privilege of authorities only, i.e. the same must apply for access to the new register with the list of beneficiaries. Consultation via a financial intermediary does not make any sense and does not help them either. Further, financial intermediaries cannot be held responsible for the register to be kept correctly, for if they find mistakes, financial intermediaries have no way of forcing companies to correct these mistakes. The new register as well the Anti Money Laundering Act provide for different definitions for certain categories of companies (e.g. those that do not exercise any business activity), which entails systematic deviations and financial intermediaries are not responsible for reporting these deviations. Many a client is sensitive when it comes to the protection of their assets, and London and Luxembourg are the only the two competing marketplaces that grant financial intermediaries access to their registers. FATF does not require that financial intermediaries have access to the register.

Further, the register is of no use for financial intermediaries as the Anti Money Laundering Act forces them to check the relevant data.

Even though the draft law does not plan for this, both FINMA and auditors might check whether financial intermediaries have consulted the register on a regular basis and whether or not deviations have been reported. Even if the access for financial intermediaries is strictly limited, those that access the register can pass on data. The term “financial intermediaries” does not only include banks but also factoring companies and foreign exchange traders – and it would be easy to simply found a company in order to be granted access to the register.

This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0]

RECENT POSTS

“Platzgen”

The Case: What on earth is “Platzgen” ? – A Swiss precision throwing sport: part pétanque, part strength training, which is played with a heavy pointed metal throwing disc. The Commentary: Platzgen is a traditional Swiss precision sport, particularly popular in the German-speaking part of Switzerland with around 50 active…

Super Saint-Bernard to be dismantled

The Case: The Super Saint-Bernard ski area near Bourg-Saint-Pierre in Valais has been closed since 2010. The Commentary: Opened in 1963, the ski area used to have around 27 km of slopes at altitudes of up to 2,800 metres. A reopening would have required investments of around CHF 25 million,…

Search

TRANSLATE

Newsletter

Related Posts

Critics are not buying into AI industry altruism

The Case: Only few days after several calls from AI chief scientists to pace (i.e. slow down) AI development, critics highlight the financial interests behind the AI industry. The Commentary: Despite being fierce rivals, the CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei, are now jointly calling for…

Extension of the Swiss AMLA to Advisers

The Case: As of 1 October 2026, the scope of the Swiss Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) is extended to certain advisory activities. The Commentary: Whether an adviser falls within the scope of the AMLA does not depend on the adviser’s designation or legal form, but on the nature and specific…

Categories