The case

The Swiss Supreme Court just published a ground-breaking judgment!

Source: David Wallace Wilson SWLegal and 5A_89/2024 decision of 16 Dezember 2024 II. zivilrechtliche Abteilung (German)

The commentary

After G’s death in 2013, an inventory of his estate was drawn up and his 6 heirs agreed on the estate division – in particular, his 3 grandchildren assigned their rights to his 3 children against compensation.

In 2017, 2 children applied for a voluntary disclosure – it emerged that G has been the settlor of a Liechtenstein trust; G has been its sole unrestricted beneficiary of capital and income during his lifetime; and after G’s death, only these 2 heirs had become trust beneficiaries. Thus, a supplementary inventory was drawn up, including the trust assets, and the grandchildren demanded a redistribution. Their claim was rejected at first, partially upheld on appeal, but ultimately dismissed.

For the Swiss Supreme Court, an irrevocable discretionary trust does NOT form part of the deceased’s estate. In particular, a trust’s tax treatment (e.g. as transparent) can well differ from its legal qualification under succession law. Irrevocable discretionary trusts do NOT necessarily violate Swiss inheritance laws. Specifically, distributions received by heirs/beneficiaries during the settlor’s lifetime are in principle subject to hotchpot (rapport / Ausgleichung); same for fixed interest trusts; but not for irrevocable discretionary trusts.

This publication has been prepared solely for information purposes and is does not constitute a recommendation, a solicitation, or an offer. The information on which this publication is based has been obtained from sources that we believe to be reliable and in good faith, but we have not independently verified such information and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy. All expressions of opinion are made as of the date of publication and may be subject to change without notice. k-flash and all related affiliates accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for any consequential loss of any kind arising out of the use of this publication or any part of its contents. The use of this publication should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise by the recipient of his or her own judgment. This publication is not directed to any person in any jurisdictions that prohibit such publication.